State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station vs Prakash Alias Munna Laxman Nandiwale Advocate - I. A. Kamble — 69/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,392,394,397,323,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO060005942022
Filing Number
342/2022
Filing Date
22-11-2022
Registration No
69/2022
Registration Date
23-11-2022
Court
Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
Shirol Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station
Adv. U. M. Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
Prakash Alias Munna Laxman Nandiwale Advocate - I. A. Kamble
Bajrang Alias Bajya Vasant Nandiwale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur acquitted both accused (Prakash Nandiwale and Bajarang Nandiwale) of charges under IPC sections 302 (murder), 392, 394, 397, 323 read with 34 (robbery and hurt). While the court found the death of 65-year-old Champabai was homicidal (caused by strangulation), it ruled the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime, citing weak circumstantial evidence and procedural irregularities in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur acquitted both accused (Prakash Nandiwale and Bajarang Nandiwale) of charges under IPC sections 302 (murder), 392, 394, 397, 323 read with 34 (robbery and hurt). While the court found the death of 65-year-old Champabai was homicidal (caused by strangulation), it ruled the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime, citing weak circumstantial evidence and procedural irregularities in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts