The State of Maharashtra vs Vaibhav @ Somya Raju Dhumale Advocate - S. D. Jagdale — 700004/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366(A),363. Disposed: Uncontested--ABATED on 10th March 2026.
Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case under POCSO Act
CNR: MHKO060004912015
Filing Number
700660/2015
Filing Date
28-11-2015
Registration No
700004/2015
Registration Date
28-11-2015
Court
Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ABATED
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
Jaysingpur Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. U. M. Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
Vaibhav @ Somya Raju Dhumale Advocate - S. D. Jagdale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur, ordered the abatement of the case on 10-03-2026 after the accused was reported to be dead. Under Indian criminal procedure law, a criminal case abates upon the death of the accused, as there is no longer a surviving party to prosecute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur, ordered the abatement of the case on 10-03-2026 after the accused was reported to be dead. Under Indian criminal procedure law, a criminal case abates upon the death of the accused, as there is no longer a surviving party to prosecute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts