State of Maharashtra Through Kurundwad Police Station vs Shivraj Sadashiv Mane — 25/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376[2],[F][I][J], 506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHKO060004722023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
264/2023
Filing Date
13-10-2023
Registration No
25/2023
Registration Date
17-10-2023
Court
Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
276
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Kurundwad Police Station
Adv. V. G. Sardesai
Respondent(s)
Shivraj Sadashiv Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Case No. 25/2023 Outcome: Bail application REJECTED Shivraj Sadashiv Mane, accused of repeatedly sexually assaulting a 12-year-old student in his private coaching class starting January 2023, was denied bail. The victim became pregnant and gave birth to a child. The Additional Sessions Judge found the offense serious under IPC sections 376(2)(f), (i), (j) and POCSO Act, rejecting the accused's arguments about delayed FIR and fabricated evidence, noting the gravity of a teacher abusing his student's trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Case No. 25/2023 Outcome: Bail application REJECTED Shivraj Sadashiv Mane, accused of repeatedly sexually assaulting a 12-year-old student in his private coaching class starting January 2023, was denied bail. The victim became pregnant and gave birth to a child. The Additional Sessions Judge found the offense serious under IPC sections 376(2)(f), (i), (j) and POCSO Act, rejecting the accused's arguments about delayed FIR and fabricated evidence, noting the gravity of a teacher abusing his student's trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts