Shekhar Shivajirao Pawar vs State of Maharashtra etc. 2 Advocate - V. G. Sardesai — 700021/2015
Case under Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act Section 397. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHKO060003992015
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
700548/2015
Filing Date
23-09-2015
Registration No
700021/2015
Registration Date
01-10-2015
Court
Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shekhar Shivajirao Pawar
Adv. P. A. Sutar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra etc. 2 Advocate - V. G. Sardesai
Sou. Suman Balasaheb bhagate
Adv. J. J. Pomaje
Smt. Vandana Appasaheb Magdum
Adv. J. J. Pomaje
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Criminal Revision Application No. 21/2015 was rejected. The applicants challenged the J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur's order directing investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. into allegations of forged documents (will-deed and medical certificate) related to Dr. J.J. Magdum's estate. The court found that the J.M.F.C. properly applied judicial mind in ordering investigation and found prima facie substance in the allegations. The court rejected the applicants' plea to quash the investigation order, holding that criminal liability cannot be overlooked merely because civil proceedings are pending, and allowed the investigation to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Criminal Revision Application No. 21/2015 was rejected. The applicants challenged the J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur's order directing investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. into allegations of forged documents (will-deed and medical certificate) related to Dr. J.J. Magdum's estate. The court found that the J.M.F.C. properly applied judicial mind in ordering investigation and found prima facie substance in the allegations. The court rejected the applicants' plea to quash the investigation order, holding that criminal liability cannot be overlooked merely because civil proceedings are pending, and allowed the investigation to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts