Imran Kashim Mulla vs State of maharashtra Throug Kurundwad Police Station — 45/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 24th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO060001212026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Kurundwad Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976 Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

Imran Kashim Mulla

Adv. GERADE MAHESH SURESH

Respondent(s)

State of maharashtra Throug Kurundwad Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.

24-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

Reply/Say

17-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Reply/Say

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted bail to accused Imran Kashim Mulla in a case involving charges under BNS sections 352, 351(2) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that since the major investigation portion was completed, there was no recovery or discovery needed from the accused, and the complainant's wife had filed a counter-case against the complainant for beating, making the accused entitled to bail of Rs. 20,000 with a condition to remain present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Imran Kashim Mulla in a case involving charges under BNS sections 352, 351(2) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that since the major investigation portion was completed, there was no recovery or discovery needed from the accused, and the complainant's wife had filed a counter-case against the complainant for beating, making the accused entitled to bail of Rs. 20,000 with a condition to remain present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case