Imran Kashim Mulla vs State of maharashtra Throug Kurundwad Police Station — 45/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 24th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO060001212026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Imran Kashim Mulla
Adv. GERADE MAHESH SURESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of maharashtra Throug Kurundwad Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to accused Imran Kashim Mulla in a case involving charges under BNS sections 352, 351(2) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that since the major investigation portion was completed, there was no recovery or discovery needed from the accused, and the complainant's wife had filed a counter-case against the complainant for beating, making the accused entitled to bail of Rs. 20,000 with a condition to remain present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
20-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
13-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2026
The court granted bail to accused Imran Kashim Mulla in a case involving charges under BNS sections 352, 351(2) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that since the major investigation portion was completed, there was no recovery or discovery needed from the accused, and the complainant's wife had filed a counter-case against the complainant for beating, making the accused entitled to bail of Rs. 20,000 with a condition to remain present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts