Shri Shankarlal Gopilala Choudhari vs State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO060001172026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
81/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri Shankarlal Gopilala Choudhari
Adv. PATIL SHANTGONDA BABGONDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of Shankarlal Gopilal Choudhari, accused of illegal possession and sale of explosives under BNS Section 288 and the Explosive Substances Act. The judge found that the accused holds a valid license for explosive possession for his stone-blasting business, the evidence (muddamal) was already recovered, and custodial interrogation was unnecessary given his age, permanent residence, and clean antecedents. The accused was granted bail on execution of personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with conditions to cooperate in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
07-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Asj Jaysingpur.
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2026
The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of Shankarlal Gopilal Choudhari, accused of illegal possession and sale of explosives under BNS Section 288 and the Explosive Substances Act. The judge found that the accused holds a valid license for explosive possession for his stone-blasting business, the evidence (muddamal) was already recovered, and custodial interrogation was unnecessary given his age, permanent residence, and clean antecedents. The accused was granted bail on execution of personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with conditions to cooperate in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts