Shri Shankarlal Gopilala Choudhari vs State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station — 43/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO060001172026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

81/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 288
EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES ACT Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Shri Shankarlal Gopilala Choudhari

Adv. PATIL SHANTGONDA BABGONDA

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and ASJ Jaysingpur.

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of Shankarlal Gopilal Choudhari, accused of illegal possession and sale of explosives under BNS Section 288 and the Explosive Substances Act. The judge found that the accused holds a valid license for explosive possession for his stone-blasting business, the evidence (muddamal) was already recovered, and custodial interrogation was unnecessary given his age, permanent residence, and clean antecedents. The accused was granted bail on execution of personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with conditions to cooperate in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of Shankarlal Gopilal Choudhari, accused of illegal possession and sale of explosives under BNS Section 288 and the Explosive Substances Act. The judge found that the accused holds a valid license for explosive possession for his stone-blasting business, the evidence (muddamal) was already recovered, and custodial interrogation was unnecessary given his age, permanent residence, and clean antecedents. The accused was granted bail on execution of personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with conditions to cooperate in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. District Court , Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case