Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar vs State of Maharashtra through Ichalkaranji Police Station Ichalkaranji — 328/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO050060752025
e-Filing Number
04-12-2025
Filing Number
4502/2025
Filing Date
04-12-2025
Registration No
328/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
283
Police Station
Gav- Bhag Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar
Adv. SUTAR VAIBHAV MOHAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through Ichalkaranji Police Station Ichalkaranji
Hearing History
Judge: 6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 02-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 04-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 21-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar's application under BNSS Sections 497 and 503 to recover interim custody of his seized Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle and Samsung mobile phone. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner based on submitted documentation and reasoned that prolonged police custody risked property damage without investigative benefit, citing Supreme Court precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The motorcycle and mobile were released upon execution of an ₹80,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale/transfer, alterations, and requiring production as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar's application under BNSS Sections 497 and 503 to recover interim custody of his seized Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle and Samsung mobile phone. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner based on submitted documentation and reasoned that prolonged police custody risked property damage without investigative benefit, citing Supreme Court precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The motorcycle and mobile were released upon execution of an ₹80,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale/transfer, alterations, and requiring production as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts