Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar vs State of Maharashtra through Ichalkaranji Police Station Ichalkaranji — 328/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO050060752025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-12-2025

Filing Number

4502/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

328/2025

Registration Date

06-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

283

Police Station

Gav- Bhag Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar

Adv. SUTAR VAIBHAV MOHAN

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra through Ichalkaranji Police Station Ichalkaranji

Hearing History

Judge: 6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

04-02-2026

Reply/Say

21-01-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar's application under BNSS Sections 497 and 503 to recover interim custody of his seized Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle and Samsung mobile phone. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner based on submitted documentation and reasoned that prolonged police custody risked property damage without investigative benefit, citing Supreme Court precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The motorcycle and mobile were released upon execution of an ₹80,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale/transfer, alterations, and requiring production as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Sunil Sudhakar Mandavkar's application under BNSS Sections 497 and 503 to recover interim custody of his seized Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle and Samsung mobile phone. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner based on submitted documentation and reasoned that prolonged police custody risked property damage without investigative benefit, citing Supreme Court precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The motorcycle and mobile were released upon execution of an ₹80,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale/transfer, alterations, and requiring production as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case