Bhalchandra Nagesh Gajendragadkar vs No One — 142/2025
Case under Coasting Vessels Act Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO050056922025
e-Filing Number
12-11-2025
Filing Number
1466/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
142/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
5-5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhalchandra Nagesh Gajendragadkar
Adv. savita nishant patil
Shrikant Nagesh Gajendragadkar
Adv. savita nishant patil
Respondent(s)
No One
Hearing History
Judge: 5-5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted a heirship certificate to the three applicants under the Bombay Regulation VIII Act, 1827, recognizing them as legally valid heirs of the deceased Ambutai Nagesh Gajendragadkar, who died unmarried in 1996. The court based its decision on submitted death certificates, affidavit evidence, and the absence of any objections following public notice publication. The court clarified that while the certificate formally recognizes the applicants' heir status for legal proceedings and property mutations, it does not confer any property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted a heirship certificate to the three applicants under the Bombay Regulation VIII Act, 1827, recognizing them as legally valid heirs of the deceased Ambutai Nagesh Gajendragadkar, who died unmarried in 1996. The court based its decision on submitted death certificates, affidavit evidence, and the absence of any objections following public notice publication. The court clarified that while the certificate formally recognizes the applicants' heir status for legal proceedings and property mutations, it does not confer any property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts