Vithabai Ganpat Kambale vs Amar Babasaheb Kambale Advocate - S. S. Mane — 351/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO050052562025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-10-2025
Filing Number
1356/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
351/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vithabai Ganpat Kambale
Adv. HIREMATH BASAVESHWAR KEMPAYYA
Mangal Ravindra Kambale urf Walvekar
Adv. HIREMATH BASAVESHWAR KEMPAYYA
Respondent(s)
Amar Babasaheb Kambale Advocate - S. S. Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Vithabai Kamble & Ors.) against the defendant (Amar Kamble) in a property dispute. The defendant allegedly purchased the plaintiffs' house property through a sale deed but never paid the consideration amount of Rs. 4,90,000, taking advantage of the elderly plaintiff's age and poor vision. The court temporarily restrained the defendant from creating any charge on the property or alienating it to third parties until the next hearing date of 30.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Vithabai Kamble & Ors.) against the defendant (Amar Kamble) in a property dispute. The defendant allegedly purchased the plaintiffs' house property through a sale deed but never paid the consideration amount of Rs. 4,90,000, taking advantage of the elderly plaintiff's age and poor vision. The court temporarily restrained the defendant from creating any charge on the property or alienating it to third parties until the next hearing date of 30.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts