Vithabai Ganpat Kambale vs Amar Babasaheb Kambale Advocate - S. S. Mane — 351/2025

Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO050052562025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

1356/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

351/2025

Registration Date

13-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34 38

Petitioner(s)

Vithabai Ganpat Kambale

Adv. HIREMATH BASAVESHWAR KEMPAYYA

Mangal Ravindra Kambale urf Walvekar

Adv. HIREMATH BASAVESHWAR KEMPAYYA

Respondent(s)

Amar Babasaheb Kambale Advocate - S. S. Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

05-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

13-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Vithabai Kamble & Ors.) against the defendant (Amar Kamble) in a property dispute. The defendant allegedly purchased the plaintiffs' house property through a sale deed but never paid the consideration amount of Rs. 4,90,000, taking advantage of the elderly plaintiff's age and poor vision. The court temporarily restrained the defendant from creating any charge on the property or alienating it to third parties until the next hearing date of 30.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Vithabai Kamble & Ors.) against the defendant (Amar Kamble) in a property dispute. The defendant allegedly purchased the plaintiffs' house property through a sale deed but never paid the consideration amount of Rs. 4,90,000, taking advantage of the elderly plaintiff's age and poor vision. The court temporarily restrained the defendant from creating any charge on the property or alienating it to third parties until the next hearing date of 30.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case