Aditya Rajratna Agrawal vs Rajratna Babulal Agrawal and 5 other — 78/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.37. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHKO050035302020

Filing Number

934/2020

Filing Date

01-Dec-2020

Registration No

78/2020

Registration Date

04-Dec-2020

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

4-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aditya Rajratna Agrawal

    Adv. J. M. Bairgadar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajratna Babulal Agrawal and 5 other

  2. 2.Sou. Nidhi Rajratna Agrawal

  3. 3.Sou. Prachi Nilesh Kasat

  4. 4.Smt. kailasdevi Babulal Agrawal

  5. 5.Navratna Babulal Agrawal

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  9. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  11. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  12. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  13. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  14. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  15. 08-Oct-2024

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  17. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  18. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  19. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  20. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  21. 09-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  22. 06-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  23. 12-Apr-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  24. 23-Feb-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  25. 20-Jan-2023

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  26. 05-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  27. 19-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  28. 11-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  29. 20-Jun-2022

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  30. 22-Mar-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  31. 12-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  32. 07-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  33. 15-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  34. 24-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  35. 07-Oct-2021

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 78/2020 Outcome: The interim application for temporary injunction was rejected with costs on October 7, 2021. Aditya Rajratan Agrawal (son/coparcener) sought to restrain his father Rajratan Babulal Agrawal (Karta) and mother from transferring or encumbering jointly-held property in Ichalkaranji. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court held that a coparcener cannot obtain injunctive relief restraining the Karta from alienating coparcenary property, as the Karta has discretionary management authority over joint family assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 07-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  37. 01-Oct-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  38. 20-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  39. 02-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  40. 13-Aug-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  41. 20-Jul-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  42. 17-Jun-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  43. 15-Apr-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  44. 12-Apr-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  45. 24-Mar-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  46. 12-Mar-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  47. 30-Jan-2021

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  48. 07-Jan-2021

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  49. 19-Dec-2020

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  50. 05-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 01-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 78/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 78/2020 Outcome: The interim application for temporary injunction was rejected with costs on October 7, 2021. Aditya Rajratan Agrawal (son/coparcener) sought to restrain his father Rajratan Babulal Agrawal (Karta) and mother from transferring or encumbering jointly-held property in Ichalkaranji. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court held that a coparcener cannot obtain injunctive relief restraining the Karta from alienating coparcenary property, as the Karta has discretionary management authority over joint family assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case