M/s Upkar Tex Com Prop. Chameli Bharat Salecha Through Tilok Nemaram Kumawat vs M/s K. Apparels prop. Kejal Arvind Bakhai Advocate - Ashok Ghanshyam Agarwal — 94/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O. 7 R. 2. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHKO050033562022
Filing Number
1038/2022
Filing Date
05-Aug-2022
Registration No
94/2022
Registration Date
08-Aug-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
4-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Upkar Tex Com Prop. Chameli Bharat Salecha Through Tilok Nemaram Kumawat
Adv. N. K. Laddha
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s K. Apparels prop. Kejal Arvind Bakhai Advocate - Ashok Ghanshyam Agarwal
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
16-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
02-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
24-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 94/2022 The court allowed the defendant's application to amend issues 3 and 4. The court held that the burden of proving the plaintiff's proprietorship of M/s. Upkar Texcom and service of the notice dated 28/12/2021 cannot be shifted to the defendant as negative burden. Issues were amended to require the plaintiff to prove these facts instead. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
11-Dec-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
20-Dec-2023
IssuesView PDF
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
13-Oct-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
23-Aug-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
13-Jun-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
15-Mar-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
06-Jan-2023
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
18-Nov-2022
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
10-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji
-
11-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2022
Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 94/2022 The court allowed the defendant's application to amend issues 3 and 4. The court held that the burden of proving the plaintiff's proprietorship of M/s. Upkar Texcom and service of the notice dated 28/12/2021 cannot be shifted to the defendant as negative burden. Issues were amended to require the plaintiff to prove these facts instead. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts