Sachin Janardhan Daivadnya vs Sahayak Abhiyanta Maharashtra Rajya Vidut Vitran Co Maryadit Limited Shakha Kabnur — 181/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section sec 38. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Order on Exh Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO050021292023

e-Filing Number

05-06-2023

Filing Number

599/2023

Filing Date

05-Jun-2023

Registration No

181/2023

Registration Date

08-Jun-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section sec 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Janardhan Daivadnya

    Adv. CHUDMUNGE SHIVRAJ SHRIKRISHNA

  2. 2.Prakash Janardhan Daivadnya

    Adv. CHUDMUNGE SHIVRAJ SHRIKRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sahayak Abhiyanta Maharashtra Rajya Vidut Vitran Co Maryadit Limited Shakha Kabnur

  2. 2.Atirikta Karyakari Abhiyanta Maharashtra Rajya Vidut Vitran Co Maryadit Limited Ichalkaranji

  3. 3.Sanjay Sambhaji Waghmare

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  11. 05-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  12. 31-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  15. 23-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  17. 19-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  19. 29-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  20. 05-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  21. 25-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  22. 18-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  23. 18-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  24. 01-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  25. 21-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  26. 09-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  27. 03-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  28. 22-Nov-2024

    Reply/Say

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  29. 16-Oct-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  30. 09-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  31. 06-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  32. 22-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  33. 22-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  34. 11-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  35. 12-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  36. 02-Sep-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  37. 09-Aug-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  38. 09-Aug-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 181/2023 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under CPC Order VII Rule 11 was rejected at this stage, with liberty to revive. A separate order was passed on an application filed under CPC Order XXVI Rule 9. Key Facts: Plaintiffs alleged that defendant No. 3 misrepresented property details to the electricity board, causing an electricity pole to be erected on their property (CTS No. 25125) instead of defendant's property (CTS No. 25115), with falsified documents showing it in the correct location. Reasoning: Although the court acknowledged civil court jurisdiction is barred under Section 145 of the Electricity Act 2003 for matters within the electricity board's purview, it found the core issue here is misrepresentation of property location, not merely objection to pole erection. The court determined that factual verification of the pole's actual location is essential before dismissing the suit, as this factual matrix would determine whether civil rights violations occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  39. 09-Aug-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  40. 07-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  41. 02-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  42. 27-Jul-2023

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  43. 26-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  44. 12-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  45. 05-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  46. 28-Jun-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  47. 23-Jun-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  48. 23-Jun-2023

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  49. 22-Jun-2023

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  50. 19-Jun-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  51. 12-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  52. 09-Jun-2023

    First Order

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  53. 08-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 05-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 181/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 181/2023 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under CPC Order VII Rule 11 was rejected at this stage, with liberty to revive. A separate order was passed on an application filed under CPC Order XXVI Rule 9. Key Facts: Plaintiffs alleged that defendant No. 3 misrepresented property details to the electricity board, causing an electricity pole to be erected on their property (CTS No. 25125) instead of defendant's property (CTS No. 25115), with falsified documents showing it in the correct location. Reasoning: Although the court acknowledged civil court jurisdiction is barred under Section 145 of the Electricity Act 2003 for matters within the electricity board's purview, it found the core issue here is misrepresentation of property location, not merely objection to pole erection. The court determined that factual verification of the pole's actual location is essential before dismissing the suit, as this factual matrix would determine whether civil rights violations occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case