Parasharam Shiva Koli vs Collector Kolhapur — 105/2024

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34 38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Steps Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO050012422024

e-Filing Number

29-02-2024

Filing Number

290/2024

Filing Date

29-Feb-2024

Registration No

105/2024

Registration Date

02-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

4-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parasharam Shiva Koli

    Adv. SAVEKAR SHANKAR BANDU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Collector Kolhapur

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  6. 30-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  7. 29-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  8. 08-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji

  9. 18-Jun-2025

    Steps

    Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ichalkaranji

  10. 27-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  11. 27-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  12. 16-Jan-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  13. 06-Nov-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  14. 25-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  15. 27-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The plaintiff's application for status-quo to prevent execution of a 1991 decree by the Collector and Superintendent of Land and Record was rejected by the Civil Judge on 27.08.2024. The court held that granting status-quo would be improper without hearing all defendants, several of whom remain unserved, and that it would prejudice the rights of parties in whose favor the earlier decree was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 27-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  17. 28-Jun-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  18. 19-Apr-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  19. 27-Mar-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  20. 11-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  21. 05-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  22. 02-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 29-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for status-quo to prevent execution of a 1991 decree by the Collector and Superintendent of Land and Record was rejected by the Civil Judge on 27.08.2024. The court held that granting status-quo would be improper without hearing all defendants, several of whom remain unserved, and that it would prejudice the rights of parties in whose favor the earlier decree was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case