State of Maharashtra vs Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute — 721/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO050012292026
Filing Number
933/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
721/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
771
Police Station
Shivaji Nagar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 721/2026 State of Maharashtra v. Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute The court found the accused guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products (betel leaf mixtures with tobacco and arecanut) without proper health warnings from his betel shop in Ichalkaranji on 26/11/2025. The accused admitted to the charges and requested lenient punishment; the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 or, in default, 4 days imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 721/2026
Summary of Case 721/2026 State of Maharashtra v. Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute The court found the accused guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products (betel leaf mixtures with tobacco and arecanut) without proper health warnings from his betel shop in Ichalkaranji on 26/11/2025. The accused admitted to the charges and requested lenient punishment; the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 or, in default, 4 days imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts