State of Maharashtra vs Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute — 721/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO050012292026

Case disposed

Filing Number

933/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

721/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

771

Police Station

Shivaji Nagar Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE CIGARETTES AND OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS (PACKAGING AND LABELLING) RULES Section 20

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Summons_Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 721/2026 State of Maharashtra v. Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute The court found the accused guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products (betel leaf mixtures with tobacco and arecanut) without proper health warnings from his betel shop in Ichalkaranji on 26/11/2025. The accused admitted to the charges and requested lenient punishment; the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 or, in default, 4 days imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 721/2026 State of Maharashtra v. Samadhan Sadashiv Satpute The court found the accused guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products (betel leaf mixtures with tobacco and arecanut) without proper health warnings from his betel shop in Ichalkaranji on 26/11/2025. The accused admitted to the charges and requested lenient punishment; the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 or, in default, 4 days imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case