State of Maharashtra vs Shivaji Shankar Bongarde — 719/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO050012272026
Filing Number
931/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
719/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
767
Police Station
Shivaji Nagar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivaji Shankar Bongarde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In this 2026 Lok Adalat case, Shivaji Shankar Bongarde was charged under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products (supari, tobacco, and betel leaf mixture) without proper warning labels on November 26, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty and requested minimal punishment; the court convicted him and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with 4 days simple imprisonment as alternate punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 719/2026
Summary: In this 2026 Lok Adalat case, Shivaji Shankar Bongarde was charged under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products (supari, tobacco, and betel leaf mixture) without proper warning labels on November 26, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty and requested minimal punishment; the court convicted him and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with 4 days simple imprisonment as alternate punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts