State of Maharashtra vs Prathamesh / Nilesh Mahadev Kadam — 718/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO050012262026

Filing Number

930/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

718/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

769

Police Station

Shivaji Nagar Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prathamesh / Nilesh Mahadev Kadam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court found Prathamesh (also known as Nilesh Mahadev Kadam) guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products without proper safety warnings from his betel shop on 26/11/2025. The accused pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with 4 days imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 718/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found Prathamesh (also known as Nilesh Mahadev Kadam) guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for selling unlabeled tobacco products without proper safety warnings from his betel shop on 26/11/2025. The accused pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with 4 days imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case