State of Maharashtra vs Ganesh Vijay Dangare — 717/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO050012252026

Filing Number

929/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

717/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

770

Police Station

Shivaji Nagar Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Vijay Dangare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 717/2026 Ganesh Vijay Dangare was convicted under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for illegally selling gutkha and tobacco products without proper labeling or health warnings from his shop on November 26, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty and requested minimal punishment, leading the court to impose a fine of Rs. 500 with four days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 717/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 717/2026 Ganesh Vijay Dangare was convicted under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for illegally selling gutkha and tobacco products without proper labeling or health warnings from his shop on November 26, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty and requested minimal punishment, leading the court to impose a fine of Rs. 500 with four days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case