State of Maharashtra vs Chand Rashid Sheikh — 716/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO050012242026

Filing Number

928/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

716/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

1-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

Shivaji Nagar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chand Rashid Sheikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court found defendant Chand Rashid Sheikh guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for illegally selling unlabeled tobacco products (supari, tobacco, and betel leaf mixture) without proper warning labels from his pan shop on 14/02/2026. The defendant pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹500, with 4 days imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 716/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found defendant Chand Rashid Sheikh guilty under Section 20 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for illegally selling unlabeled tobacco products (supari, tobacco, and betel leaf mixture) without proper warning labels from his pan shop on 14/02/2026. The defendant pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹500, with 4 days imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case