Sou Madhuri Kundlik Dikshit vs Shri Kundlik Govardhan Dikshit — 81/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1a) (ib). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition

CNR: MHKO050011102025

e-Filing Number

25-02-2025

Filing Number

286/2025

Filing Date

25-Feb-2025

Registration No

81/2025

Registration Date

01-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

4-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1a) (ib)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sou Madhuri Kundlik Dikshit

    Adv. S.V.Rajput

  2. 2.Kum Samta Kundlik Dikshit minor karita mother

    Adv. Vinayak Bhasme

  3. 3.Kum Sanchita Kundlik Dikshit Mnor karita Mother

    Adv. Vinayak Bhasme

  4. 4.Rajvardhan Kundlik Dikshit Mnor katira Mother

    Adv. Vinayak Bhasme

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri Kundlik Govardhan Dikshit

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: Hindu Divorce Petition 81/2025 Court Decision: The Ichalkaranji Civil Court granted the divorce petition filed by Sou. Madhuri Kundlik Dikshit against Shri Kundlik Govardhan Dikshit under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, finding that the respondent abandoned the petitioner for over two years without reasonable cause and subjected her to mental and physical cruelty. Key Facts: The couple married in 2009 and had three children. The petitioner alleged the respondent engaged in alcoholism, verbal abuse, physical violence, financial exploitation (including misappropriation of dowry), and abandonment—particularly after a workplace embezzlement incident. The respondent failed to appear and contest the petition. Reasoning: The court found the petitioner's uncontested evidence credible, establishing both abandonment exceeding two years and sustained cruelty, thereby entitling her to dissolution of marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  16. 02-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Ichalkaranji

  17. 12-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Hindu Divorce Petition 81/2025 Court Decision: The Ichalkaranji Civil Court granted the divorce petition filed by Sou. Madhuri Kundlik Dikshit against Shri Kundlik Govardhan Dikshit under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, finding that the respondent abandoned the petitioner for over two years without reasonable cause and subjected her to mental and physical cruelty. Key Facts: The couple married in 2009 and had three children. The petitioner alleged the respondent engaged in alcoholism, verbal abuse, physical violence, financial exploitation (including misappropriation of dowry), and abandonment—particularly after a workplace embezzlement incident. The respondent failed to appear and contest the petition. Reasoning: The court found the petitioner's uncontested evidence credible, establishing both abandonment exceeding two years and sustained cruelty, thereby entitling her to dissolution of marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case