Rural Development Officer and Child Marriage Prevention Officer Shri Dipak Pradip Patil vs Smt Sita Amol Bhadale and others — 68/2026
Case under Prohibition of Child Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO050010962026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
817/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
68/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rural Development Officer and Child Marriage Prevention Officer Shri Dipak Pradip Patil
Adv. Adv.Kiran Ramchandra Khatavkar
Respondent(s)
Smt Sita Amol Bhadale and others
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Disposed
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted a prohibiting injunction under Section 13 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, restraining the respondents from solemnizing the marriage of 15-year-old Sneha Amol Bhadale until she completes 18 years of age. The court found that the child's marriage was being arranged in violation of the Act, and despite the respondents filing an undertaking not to proceed with the marriage, the injunction was necessary to protect the child's welfare and rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted a prohibiting injunction under Section 13 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, restraining the respondents from solemnizing the marriage of 15-year-old Sneha Amol Bhadale until she completes 18 years of age. The court found that the child's marriage was being arranged in violation of the Act, and despite the respondents filing an undertaking not to proceed with the marriage, the injunction was necessary to protect the child's welfare and rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts