Shri. Shridhar Kujapu Nayar vs Maharashtra State — 67/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,507. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 05th May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO050010892026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

813/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,507

Petitioner(s)

Shri. Shridhar Kujapu Nayar

Adv. LATAKE DATTATRAY MADHUKAR

Respondent(s)

Maharashtra State

Hearing History

Judge: 6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

05-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

22-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-04-2026

Reply/Say

09-04-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and ordered the return of the seized VIVO mobile phone to Shridhar Kujapu Nayar on execution of a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond. The court rejected the police's objections, finding no purpose in keeping the phone at the station unattended, and imposed conditions including prohibition on selling/transferring the phone, preservation of data for CDR investigation, and production on court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and ordered the return of the seized VIVO mobile phone to Shridhar Kujapu Nayar on execution of a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond. The court rejected the police's objections, finding no purpose in keeping the phone at the station unattended, and imposed conditions including prohibition on selling/transferring the phone, preservation of data for CDR investigation, and production on court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case