Rjaesh Prakash Ghorpade vs Nilesh Chandrashekar Dangara Sharma — 97/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready Next hearing 20-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO050010852023

e-Filing Number

15-03-2023

Filing Number

328/2023

Filing Date

17-Mar-2023

Registration No

97/2023

Registration Date

17-Mar-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

5-5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rjaesh Prakash Ghorpade

    Adv. Dipak Mahadev Sutar

  2. 2.Mahesh Prakash Ghorpade

    Adv. Dipak Mahadev Sutar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nilesh Chandrashekar Dangara Sharma

  2. 2.Pramod Pitambare Shingare

  3. 3.Gajanan Pitambar Shingare

  4. 4.Shivaji Shripati Giribuwa

  5. 5.Vilas Anna Khemlapure

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 97/2023 The court's application filed by defendants 1-4 under O.VII R.11 to reject the plaint on grounds that it was barred by the Maharashtra Public Trust Act and insufficiently stamped was partly allowed. The court rejected the argument that Charity Commissioner consent was required since the defendants are admittedly tenants/licensees of the trust property. However, the court upheld the insufficient stamping objection, finding that recovery of possession is the main relief sought (disguised as mandatory injunction), requiring proper property valuation and stamping under Section 6(v) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act. The plaintiff was directed to supply requisite stamp within one month or face rejection of the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  10. 22-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  13. 31-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  14. 19-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  15. 05-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  16. 13-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  17. 20-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  19. 28-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  20. 14-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji

  21. 08-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  22. 25-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  23. 12-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  24. 24-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  25. 30-Apr-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  26. 15-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  27. 05-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  28. 08-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  29. 16-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  30. 29-Nov-2023

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  31. 21-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  32. 21-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  33. 11-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  34. 27-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  35. 09-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  36. 26-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji

  37. 21-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 17-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 97/2023 The court's application filed by defendants 1-4 under O.VII R.11 to reject the plaint on grounds that it was barred by the Maharashtra Public Trust Act and insufficiently stamped was partly allowed. The court rejected the argument that Charity Commissioner consent was required since the defendants are admittedly tenants/licensees of the trust property. However, the court upheld the insufficient stamping objection, finding that recovery of possession is the main relief sought (disguised as mandatory injunction), requiring proper property valuation and stamping under Section 6(v) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act. The plaintiff was directed to supply requisite stamp within one month or face rejection of the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case