Sandip Dagdu Shinde vs Maharashtra State Through Hupari Police Station, Hupari — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO050010842026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
808/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
5-5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandip Dagdu Shinde
Adv. SHAIKH IMRAN AYUB
Respondent(s)
Maharashtra State Through Hupari Police Station, Hupari
Hearing History
Judge: 5-5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
Disposed
Report
Report
Report
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Report |
| 25-03-2026 | Report |
| 16-03-2026 | Report |
| 10-03-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court partly allowed the application under Sections 497 and 503 BNSS, granting interim possession of the seized VIVO mobile phone and Rs.2,700 cash to applicant Sandip Dagdu Shinde until trial conclusion, while rejecting return of the Aadhaar card as it was not seized. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs.18,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on sale/transfer without court permission, mandatory production when directed, and required the IO to extract relevant data and prepare a panchnama with photographs before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court partly allowed the application under Sections 497 and 503 BNSS, granting interim possession of the seized VIVO mobile phone and Rs.2,700 cash to applicant Sandip Dagdu Shinde until trial conclusion, while rejecting return of the Aadhaar card as it was not seized. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs.18,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on sale/transfer without court permission, mandatory production when directed, and required the IO to extract relevant data and prepare a panchnama with photographs before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts