Ramajan Abdul Sanadi Apradh vs Dastagor Babaso Sanadi Apradh — 1100083/2014
Case under --- Section NIL,NIL,NIL,NIL. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO050008122014
Filing Number
1100290/2014
Filing Date
24-Feb-2014
Registration No
1100083/2014
Registration Date
10-Mar-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramajan Abdul Sanadi Apradh
Adv. B,S,Kavanekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dastagor Babaso Sanadi Apradh
-
2.Shabbir Makabul Sanadi-Aparadh
Adv. S.S.Joshi
-
3.XXXXXXX
Adv. S.S.Joshi
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
10-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
31-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
07-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
14-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
17-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
16-Sep-2025
Order on Exh
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
19-Aug-2025
Order on Exh
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
02-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
22-Apr-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
28-Mar-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
13-Feb-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
07-Jan-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
13-Nov-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
25-Sep-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
05-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
18-Jun-2024
Awaiting Notice
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
05-Apr-2024
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
16-Feb-2024
Restored
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
16-Feb-2024
First Order
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
30-Jan-2018
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
SUMMARY The suit for permanent injunction filed by Ramjan Abdul Sanadi against three defendants was decreed with costs on 30 January 2018. The court found that the plaintiff was in peaceful possession of the ancestral property for over 60 years and that the defendants were attempting to obstruct that possession, thereby granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, and servants from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2018
Disposed
-
12-Jan-2018
Order
-
18-Dec-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
22-Nov-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
26-Oct-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
29-Sep-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
06-Sep-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
17-Jul-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
08-Jul-2017
Evidence Part Heard
-
13-Apr-2017
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
10-Feb-2017
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
17-Dec-2016
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
17-Oct-2016
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
20-Aug-2016
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
27-Jul-2016
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
27-Jun-2016
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
07-Jun-2016
Evidence Part Heard
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
06-Apr-2016
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
19-Mar-2016
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
20-Feb-2016
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
10-Feb-2016
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
21-Jan-2016
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
13-Jan-2016
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
07-Jan-2016
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
03-Dec-2015
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
29-Oct-2015
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
08-Oct-2015
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
04-Sep-2015
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
10-Aug-2015
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
10-Jul-2015
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Jun-2015
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
07-Apr-2015
Awaiting Summons
5th Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
13-Mar-2015
Awaiting Summons
5th Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
18-Feb-2015
Awaiting Summons
5th Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
17-Jan-2015
Awaiting Summons
5th Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
05-Jan-2015
Awaiting Summons
5th Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
27-Oct-2014
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
20-Oct-2014
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
06-Aug-2014
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
10-Jul-2014
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
21-Jun-2014
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Jun-2014
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
28-Apr-2014
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
25-Mar-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2014
Case filed
Registration No. 1100083/2014
SUMMARY The suit for permanent injunction filed by Ramjan Abdul Sanadi against three defendants was decreed with costs on 30 January 2018. The court found that the plaintiff was in peaceful possession of the ancestral property for over 60 years and that the defendants were attempting to obstruct that possession, thereby granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, and servants from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts