Mahalaxmi Traders, Prop. Shri. Ashokkumar Kanhaiylal Kesharwani vs Shri. Sanjay S/o Rajaram Prop. M. M. Traders — 468/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments (amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO050007862026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
593/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
468/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahalaxmi Traders, Prop. Shri. Ashokkumar Kanhaiylal Kesharwani
Adv. AGARWAL ASHOK GHANASHYAM
Respondent(s)
Shri. Sanjay S/o Rajaram Prop. M. M. Traders
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Awaiting Summons
Verification
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 24-02-2026 | Verification |
Interim Orders
Summary: In S.T.C. No. 468/2026 (Mahalxmi Traders v. M.M. Traders), the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ichalkaranji, issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. After conducting an inquiry under Section 225 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and examining documents, the court found prima facie evidence of cheque dishonor and sufficient grounds to proceed. The matter is returnable on 10.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In S.T.C. No. 468/2026 (Mahalxmi Traders v. M.M. Traders), the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ichalkaranji, issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. After conducting an inquiry under Section 225 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and examining documents, the court found prima facie evidence of cheque dishonor and sufficient grounds to proceed. The matter is returnable on 10.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts