Shivaji Ramchandra Vadd vs Sachin Ananda Shinde Advocate - D. M. Latake — 338/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO050006722023
Filing Number
479/2023
Filing Date
16-Feb-2023
Registration No
338/2023
Registration Date
16-Feb-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
5-5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivaji Ramchandra Vadd
Adv. G. S. Sonule
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sachin Ananda Shinde Advocate - D. M. Latake
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sachin Ananda Shinde of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that while the accused drew a Rs. 1,50,000 cheque for a legitimate debt, the complainant failed to prove the cheque's dishonor beyond reasonable doubt—specifically, the bank's return memo lacked the required official mark and certification under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, making it inadmissible as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
15-Apr-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Apr-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
04-Apr-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
06-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
02-Aug-2025
B.W._Ready
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
20-Jun-2025
B.W._Ready
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
03-Apr-2025
B.W._Ready
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Feb-2025
B.W._Ready
5th Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Dec-2024
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
29-Apr-2024
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
11-Dec-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
29-Aug-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
14-Jun-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
18-Apr-2023
Plea / Particulars
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
16-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 338/2023
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sachin Ananda Shinde of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that while the accused drew a Rs. 1,50,000 cheque for a legitimate debt, the complainant failed to prove the cheque's dishonor beyond reasonable doubt—specifically, the bank's return memo lacked the required official mark and certification under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, making it inadmissible as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts