Bhagyashree Bharat Patil vs Sunita Mahavir Patil Advocate - S. N. Mudgal — 17/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31 34 37 38. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO050001252026

Ex-Parte Order

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

08-01-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji

Judge

6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 31 34 37 38

Petitioner(s)

Bhagyashree Bharat Patil

Adv. Patil Bharat Jingonda

Respondent(s)

Sunita Mahavir Patil Advocate - S. N. Mudgal

Hearing History

Judge: 6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji

21-04-2026

Ex-Parte Order

16-03-2026

Ex-Parte Order

09-02-2026

Ex-Parte Order

12-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

12-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY Case 17/2026 is a civil suit filed by Bhagyashree Bharat Patil challenging an illegitimate succession affidavit executed on 03/09/2025 by Sunita Mahavir Patil (first respondent) claiming inheritance rights to the deceased Mahavir Annaaso Patil's property. The petitioner claims Sunita's second marriage was unlawful while the deceased's first marriage to Lakshmi remained valid; therefore, Sunita has no legal right to the estate. The court has issued summons to all defendants directing them to appear and file their written statements within 30 days, and set the matter for settlement of issues and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY Case 17/2026 is a civil suit filed by Bhagyashree Bharat Patil challenging an illegitimate succession affidavit executed on 03/09/2025 by Sunita Mahavir Patil (first respondent) claiming inheritance rights to the deceased Mahavir Annaaso Patil's property. The petitioner claims Sunita's second marriage was unlawful while the deceased's first marriage to Lakshmi remained valid; therefore, Sunita has no legal right to the estate. The court has issued summons to all defendants directing them to appear and file their written statements within 30 days, and set the matter for settlement of issues and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case