Bhagyashree Bharat Patil vs Sunita Mahavir Patil Advocate - S. N. Mudgal — 17/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31 34 37 38. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO050001252026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
6-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhagyashree Bharat Patil
Adv. Patil Bharat Jingonda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunita Mahavir Patil Advocate - S. N. Mudgal
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Ex-Parte Order
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
16-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Order
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
09-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Order
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C.Ichalkaranji
-
12-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY Case 17/2026 is a civil suit filed by Bhagyashree Bharat Patil challenging an illegitimate succession affidavit executed on 03/09/2025 by Sunita Mahavir Patil (first respondent) claiming inheritance rights to the deceased Mahavir Annaaso Patil's property. The petitioner claims Sunita's second marriage was unlawful while the deceased's first marriage to Lakshmi remained valid; therefore, Sunita has no legal right to the estate. The court has issued summons to all defendants directing them to appear and file their written statements within 30 days, and set the matter for settlement of issues and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2026
SUMMARY Case 17/2026 is a civil suit filed by Bhagyashree Bharat Patil challenging an illegitimate succession affidavit executed on 03/09/2025 by Sunita Mahavir Patil (first respondent) claiming inheritance rights to the deceased Mahavir Annaaso Patil's property. The petitioner claims Sunita's second marriage was unlawful while the deceased's first marriage to Lakshmi remained valid; therefore, Sunita has no legal right to the estate. The court has issued summons to all defendants directing them to appear and file their written statements within 30 days, and set the matter for settlement of issues and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts