M/S. PARAMHANS TEXTILE INDUSTRIES PROP. SHRI. RAJARAM CHAMPALAL BHUTADA vs M/S. KAVYA CREATION, PROP. ASHOKKUMAR AMRITLAL MANWANI — 56/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO050000602026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
46/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ichalkaranji
Judge
7-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. PARAMHANS TEXTILE INDUSTRIES PROP. SHRI. RAJARAM CHAMPALAL BHUTADA
Adv. DEEPAKKUMAR KAILASHCHAND DHOOT
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. KAVYA CREATION, PROP. ASHOKKUMAR AMRITLAL MANWANI
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 56/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate issued process against the accused (Kavya Creation) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for cheque dishonor. After conducting an inquiry under Section 225 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (necessitated because the accused resides outside the court's territorial jurisdiction), the magistrate found prima facie evidence of the offense and proceeded against the accused. The case is returnable on a date to be specified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Ichalkaranji
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2026
Case 56/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate issued process against the accused (Kavya Creation) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for cheque dishonor. After conducting an inquiry under Section 225 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (necessitated because the accused resides outside the court's territorial jurisdiction), the magistrate found prima facie evidence of the offense and proceeded against the accused. The case is returnable on a date to be specified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts