Badshah Gabi Tarala Tarf Riyaz Ahmad Badshah Taral(Legal Heir) vs May Assistant Collector, Central Excise and Customs Kolhapur — 1121/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 489. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO030153622024

e-Filing Number

04-11-2024

Filing Number

15310/2024

Filing Date

06-Nov-2024

Registration No

1121/2024

Registration Date

08-Nov-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

5-11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 489

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Badshah Gabi Tarala Tarf Riyaz Ahmad Badshah Taral(Legal Heir)

    Adv. MAHAT GAUS NABI1.

  2. 2.Shakeel Badshah Taral

    Adv. MAHAT GAUS NABI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.May Assistant Collector, Central Excise and Customs Kolhapur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the petitioner's petition and ordered the cancellation of the bail bond forfeiture proceedings against the deceased bail guarantor Badshah Gaibi Taral, since the underlying criminal case (Criminal Case No. 111/1987) was dismissed on 21/06/2006 when the accused failed to appear and was acquitted. The court directed the Tahsildar of Karvir, Kolhapur to cancel the property encumbrance (on property S.S.No. 2269) and remit the forfeited bail amount of Rs. 25,000, as the basis for the forfeiture no longer existed after the case's closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  11. 30-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  13. 13-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  14. 19-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  16. 07-May-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    6th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  17. 05-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    9th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    8th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  19. 10-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    8th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  20. 21-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    8th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    8th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  22. 22-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    8th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  23. 13-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1121/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner's petition and ordered the cancellation of the bail bond forfeiture proceedings against the deceased bail guarantor Badshah Gaibi Taral, since the underlying criminal case (Criminal Case No. 111/1987) was dismissed on 21/06/2006 when the accused failed to appear and was acquitted. The court directed the Tahsildar of Karvir, Kolhapur to cancel the property encumbrance (on property S.S.No. 2269) and remit the forfeited bail amount of Rs. 25,000, as the basis for the forfeiture no longer existed after the case's closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case