State of Maharashtra vs Onkar Vijay Chougule — 10247/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 115/117. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO030127082025
Filing Number
12679/2025
Filing Date
04-Jul-2025
Registration No
10247/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
5-11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Onkar Vijay Chougule
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted defendant Okare Vijay Chougule of charges under IPC Section 278 and Mumbai Police Act Sections 115/117 for allegedly spitting and engaging in indecent behavior at a public place (Panchganga Ghat, Kolhapur) on December 3, 2024. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (the complainant police officer) could not substantiate key facts, and no independent eyewitnesses were examined. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and acquitted him with cancellation of his bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.
-
06-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.
-
01-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
11th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.
-
13-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 10247/2025
Summary The court acquitted defendant Okare Vijay Chougule of charges under IPC Section 278 and Mumbai Police Act Sections 115/117 for allegedly spitting and engaging in indecent behavior at a public place (Panchganga Ghat, Kolhapur) on December 3, 2024. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (the complainant police officer) could not substantiate key facts, and no independent eyewitnesses were examined. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and acquitted him with cancellation of his bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts