State of Maharashtra vs Ismail Chinnu Mujawar — 9399/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030113122024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

11278/2024

Filing Date

30-07-2024

Registration No

9399/2024

Registration Date

03-08-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

Gandhinagar Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Ismail Chinnu Mujawar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur

05-05-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

24-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted accused Ismail Chinnu Mujavar of charges under IPC Section 279 (rash or negligent driving). The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his motorcycle on April 19, 2024, endangering human life. Due to contradictions in witness testimonies and lack of corroborating physical evidence, the court applied the principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted accused Ismail Chinnu Mujavar of charges under IPC Section 279 (rash or negligent driving). The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his motorcycle on April 19, 2024, endangering human life. Due to contradictions in witness testimonies and lack of corroborating physical evidence, the court applied the principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case