State of Maharashtra vs Ismail Chinnu Mujawar — 9399/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO030113122024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11278/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
9399/2024
Registration Date
03-08-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
173
Police Station
Gandhinagar Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Ismail Chinnu Mujawar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted accused Ismail Chinnu Mujavar of charges under IPC Section 279 (rash or negligent driving). The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his motorcycle on April 19, 2024, endangering human life. Due to contradictions in witness testimonies and lack of corroborating physical evidence, the court applied the principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted accused Ismail Chinnu Mujavar of charges under IPC Section 279 (rash or negligent driving). The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his motorcycle on April 19, 2024, endangering human life. Due to contradictions in witness testimonies and lack of corroborating physical evidence, the court applied the principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts