State of Maharashtra vs Amol Balaram Narkar — 6743/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO030093472024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9317/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
6743/2024
Registration Date
22-06-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Gaganbawada Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Amol Balaram Narkar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for illegal liquor sales, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite being given sufficient opportunity. The court noted that the prosecution relied on only one witness and produced no independent evidence to prove that the seized liquor was in the accused's possession for sale, thus ordering the accused's acquittal and bail cancellation with release from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for illegal liquor sales, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite being given sufficient opportunity. The court noted that the prosecution relied on only one witness and produced no independent evidence to prove that the seized liquor was in the accused's possession for sale, thus ordering the accused's acquittal and bail cancellation with release from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts