State of Maharashtra vs Amol Balaram Narkar — 6743/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030093472024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

9317/2024

Filing Date

18-06-2024

Registration No

6743/2024

Registration Date

22-06-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

Gaganbawada Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Amol Balaram Narkar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur

05-05-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

24-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for illegal liquor sales, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite being given sufficient opportunity. The court noted that the prosecution relied on only one witness and produced no independent evidence to prove that the seized liquor was in the accused's possession for sale, thus ordering the accused's acquittal and bail cancellation with release from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for illegal liquor sales, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite being given sufficient opportunity. The court noted that the prosecution relied on only one witness and produced no independent evidence to prove that the seized liquor was in the accused's possession for sale, thus ordering the accused's acquittal and bail cancellation with release from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case