State of Maharashtra vs Karan Dhondiram Patankar — 840/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75(1)(iv),79. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO030092412025
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-03-2025
Filing Number
9231/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
840/2025
Registration Date
26-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
5-11th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Laxmipuri Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Karan Dhondiram Patankar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-11th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.
Filing of Surety
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 06-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized Hero Splender Plus motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-09-FG-3140) under Section 503 B.N.S.S. was allowed. The court granted interim custody of the vehicle to applicant Karan Dhondiram Patankar till conclusion of trial, subject to execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 80,000, after finding he proved ownership and that no purpose is served by withholding the vehicle. The applicant is restricted from selling or altering the motorcycle and must produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized Hero Splender Plus motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-09-FG-3140) under Section 503 B.N.S.S. was allowed. The court granted interim custody of the vehicle to applicant Karan Dhondiram Patankar till conclusion of trial, subject to execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 80,000, after finding he proved ownership and that no purpose is served by withholding the vehicle. The applicant is restricted from selling or altering the motorcycle and must produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts