State of Maharashtra vs Avinash Vishandas Rohida — 835/2024

Case under Copyright Act Section 51,63,64. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030086212024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8591/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

835/2024

Registration Date

11-06-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

361

Police Station

Gandhinagar Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

COPYRIGHT ACT Section 51,63,64

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Avinash Vishandas Rohida

Hearing History

Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur

07-05-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

27-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

07-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused Avinash Vishindas Rohida of charges under the Copyright Act (Sections 51, 63, 64). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had knowingly sold counterfeit branded T-shirts for personal financial gain, as the evidence presented by two witnesses was insufficient and inconclusive. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused Avinash Vishindas Rohida of charges under the Copyright Act (Sections 51, 63, 64). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had knowingly sold counterfeit branded T-shirts for personal financial gain, as the evidence presented by two witnesses was insufficient and inconclusive. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case