State of Maharashtra vs Avinash Vishandas Rohida — 835/2024
Case under Copyright Act Section 51,63,64. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO030086212024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8591/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
835/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
361
Police Station
Gandhinagar Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Avinash Vishandas Rohida
Hearing History
Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused Avinash Vishindas Rohida of charges under the Copyright Act (Sections 51, 63, 64). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had knowingly sold counterfeit branded T-shirts for personal financial gain, as the evidence presented by two witnesses was insufficient and inconclusive. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kolhapur acquitted the accused Avinash Vishindas Rohida of charges under the Copyright Act (Sections 51, 63, 64). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had knowingly sold counterfeit branded T-shirts for personal financial gain, as the evidence presented by two witnesses was insufficient and inconclusive. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts