State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Narayan Khot — 5926/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 33W. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030082582025

Filing Number

8254/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

5926/2025

Registration Date

05-May-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 33W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Narayan Khot

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Narayan Khot (5926/2025) The accused was convicted under Sections 33(w) read with Section 131 of the Bombay Police Act for operating a taxi beyond permitted hours without authorization, causing inconvenience to residents. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted the plea and sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 100, with one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  6. 10-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5926/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Narayan Khot (5926/2025) The accused was convicted under Sections 33(w) read with Section 131 of the Bombay Police Act for operating a taxi beyond permitted hours without authorization, causing inconvenience to residents. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted the plea and sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 100, with one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case