State of Maharashtra vs Vijay Vishnu Kadkade — 5925/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 33W. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030082572025

Filing Number

8253/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

5925/2025

Registration Date

05-May-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 33W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Vishnu Kadkade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case 5925/2025 Summary The Lok Adalat (National Public Interest Litigation Court) in Kolhapur convicted Vijay Vishnu Kadkade under BP Act Section 33(w) for operating a tea stall beyond authorized hours. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200 or one day simple imprisonment in the alternative, with consideration given to his poor economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  6. 13-Sep-2025

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  7. 10-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5925/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 5925/2025 Summary The Lok Adalat (National Public Interest Litigation Court) in Kolhapur convicted Vijay Vishnu Kadkade under BP Act Section 33(w) for operating a tea stall beyond authorized hours. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200 or one day simple imprisonment in the alternative, with consideration given to his poor economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case