State of Maharashtra vs Najdul Jinatal Islam — 4663/2025

Case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 115/117. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030065962025

Filing Number

6607/2025

Filing Date

08-Apr-2025

Registration No

4663/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Police Act Section 115/117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Najdul Jinatal Islam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The accused, Najdul Jinatal Islam, was convicted under Sections 115/117 of the Bombay Police Act for committing public nuisance by easing himself in a public place at Tayde Hotel, Kolhapur on 12/03/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his plea, sentencing him to a minimum fine of Rs. 300 with one day simple imprisonment as default. The judgment emphasized leniency given the voluntary nature of the guilty plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    First Order

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  6. 10-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4663/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The accused, Najdul Jinatal Islam, was convicted under Sections 115/117 of the Bombay Police Act for committing public nuisance by easing himself in a public place at Tayde Hotel, Kolhapur on 12/03/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his plea, sentencing him to a minimum fine of Rs. 300 with one day simple imprisonment as default. The judgment emphasized leniency given the voluntary nature of the guilty plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case