State of Maharashtra vs Jijabai Pandit Bankar Advocate - S. V. Kumbhar — 1357/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO030047102020
Filing Number
4830/2020
Filing Date
12-08-2020
Registration No
1357/2020
Registration Date
13-08-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
446
Police Station
Shahupuri Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Jijabai Pandit Bankar Advocate - S. V. Kumbhar
Dhanashri Dhanaji Bankar
Dhanaji Pandir Bankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted all three accused persons (Jijabai Pandit Bankar, Dhanashri Dhanaji Bankar, and Dhanaji Pandit Bankar) of charges under the Maharashtra Moneylenders Regulation Act 2014 (Sections 39, 45) and Indian Penal Code 1860 (Sections 504, 506) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused engaged in unlicensed moneylending, collected repayment through intimidation, or made criminal threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted all three accused persons (Jijabai Pandit Bankar, Dhanashri Dhanaji Bankar, and Dhanaji Pandit Bankar) of charges under the Maharashtra Moneylenders Regulation Act 2014 (Sections 39, 45) and Indian Penal Code 1860 (Sections 504, 506) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused engaged in unlicensed moneylending, collected repayment through intimidation, or made criminal threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts