Nikita Akshay Magdum vs Akshay Pandurang Magdum — 88/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO030045782023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4516/2023
Filing Date
26-04-2023
Registration No
88/2023
Registration Date
29-04-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nikita Akshay Magdum
Adv. Nath S. Patil
Respondent(s)
Akshay Pandurang Magdum
Pandurang Jinappa Magdum
Mangal Pandurang Magdum
Akshata Pandurang Magdum
Madhukar Annappa Telvekar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-14th Jt. CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court petition under the Domestic Violence Act was partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000 per month to the petitioner (wife) against the respondent (husband), effective from the date of filing the petition. Additionally, the court issued protective orders restraining the respondent from causing any verbal, mental, or physical harassment to the petitioner and directed him to file an undertaking within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court petition under the Domestic Violence Act was partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000 per month to the petitioner (wife) against the respondent (husband), effective from the date of filing the petition. Additionally, the court issued protective orders restraining the respondent from causing any verbal, mental, or physical harassment to the petitioner and directed him to file an undertaking within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts