State of Maharashtra vs Ashok Kalappa Chougale Advocate - S. M. Patil — 1225/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030041402020

Filing Number

4345/2020

Filing Date

08-Jul-2020

Registration No

1225/2020

Registration Date

09-Jul-2020

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

4-14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

296

Police Station

Laxmipuri Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Kalappa Chougale Advocate - S. M. Patil

  2. 2.Amit Ashok Chougale

    Adv. Sudhakar M. Patil

  3. 3.Vijayalaxmi Ashok Chougale

    Adv. Sudhakar M. Patil

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  10. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    12th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  12. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  13. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  14. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  15. 05-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  16. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  17. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  18. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  19. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  20. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  21. 08-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  22. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  23. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  24. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  25. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  26. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  27. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  28. 14-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    13th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  29. 05-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    12th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  30. 07-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    12th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  31. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    12th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur.

  32. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  33. 16-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  34. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  35. 06-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  36. 17-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  37. 09-Jan-2023

    List of Witness

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  38. 19-Dec-2022

    List of Witness

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  39. 05-Nov-2022

    Charge

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  40. 27-Sep-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The accused's application under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking production of CCTV footage was rejected. The court held that since the application was filed at the pre-charge stage and the CCTV footage is essential for the accused's defense (which is irrelevant before framing of charge), the application was premature and not maintainable. The court cited settled law that an accused's entitlement to seek production orders ordinarily arises only at the defense stage, not before charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  41. 27-Sep-2022

    Charge

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  42. 22-Aug-2022

    Charge

    14th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kolhapur

  43. 18-Jun-2022

    Charge

    Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  44. 20-Apr-2022

    Charge

    Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  45. 10-Mar-2022

    Charge

    Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  46. 17-Feb-2022

    Charge

    Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  47. 18-Jan-2022

    Charge

    Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  48. 16-Dec-2021

    Charge

    2nd Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  49. 18-Nov-2021

    Charge

    2nd Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  50. 17-Sep-2021

    Charge

    2nd Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  51. 03-Aug-2021

    Charge

    2nd Jt.CJSD and Addl.CJM Kolhapur

  52. 24-May-2021

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  53. 05-Apr-2021

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  54. 19-Mar-2021

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  55. 10-Feb-2021

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  56. 16-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  57. 02-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  58. 17-Oct-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur

  59. 25-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 08-Jul-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1225/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The accused's application under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking production of CCTV footage was rejected. The court held that since the application was filed at the pre-charge stage and the CCTV footage is essential for the accused's defense (which is irrelevant before framing of charge), the application was premature and not maintainable. The court cited settled law that an accused's entitlement to seek production orders ordinarily arises only at the defense stage, not before charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case