Indian Bank Through Authorized Officer Ravi Raushan Kumar Singh vs Lakhan Arjun Kate — 365/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO030032422026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
3243/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
365/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Indian Bank Through Authorized Officer Ravi Raushan Kumar Singh
Adv. PATIL MANISHA BAJIRAO
Respondent(s)
Lakhan Arjun Kate
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Indian Bank v. Lakhan Arjun Kate (365/2026) The court granted Indian Bank's application for a possession warrant and police protection under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank had issued a demand notice on 17.05.2025 after the borrower defaulted on a home loan of Rs.20,60,000 plus a top-up loan of Rs.1,76,000 (total outstanding: Rs.24,26,833), secured by a residential property in Kolhapur. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the warrant and directed police protection and Special Bailiff charges at the applicant's cost, with compliance to be reported within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Indian Bank v. Lakhan Arjun Kate (365/2026) The court granted Indian Bank's application for a possession warrant and police protection under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank had issued a demand notice on 17.05.2025 after the borrower defaulted on a home loan of Rs.20,60,000 plus a top-up loan of Rs.1,76,000 (total outstanding: Rs.24,26,833), secured by a residential property in Kolhapur. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the warrant and directed police protection and Special Bailiff charges at the applicant's cost, with compliance to be reported within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts