State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Bhau Kamble — 552/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030021662026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

2168/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

552/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

6-15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

181

Police Station

Gaganbawada Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Bhau Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 552/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Kolhapur convicted Sagar Bhau Kamble under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 19/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lokadalat. Considering his guilty plea, lack of criminal antecedents, poor financial condition, and family dependence, the court imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 2,000 fine (in default, 2 days simple imprisonment) instead of the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 552/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 552/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Kolhapur convicted Sagar Bhau Kamble under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 19/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lokadalat. Considering his guilty plea, lack of criminal antecedents, poor financial condition, and family dependence, the court imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 2,000 fine (in default, 2 days simple imprisonment) instead of the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case