Durgesh Shankar Jadhav vs State Of Maharashtra Through Shahupuri Police Thane — 188/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO030020512026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2026
Filing Number
2052/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
188/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
995
Police Station
Shahupuri Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Durgesh Shankar Jadhav
Adv. Balraj Chandrashekhar Salokhe
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Through Shahupuri Police Thane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Kolhapur
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 26-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 188/2026 The court allowed Durgesh Jadhav's application to release his seized Oppo mobile handset (IMEI 866418082465391) into interim custody pending trial of C.R. 995/2025 (animal cruelty charges). The handset must be released on a Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions: the applicant cannot alter, transfer, or damage the device and must produce it whenever directed by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 188/2026 The court allowed Durgesh Jadhav's application to release his seized Oppo mobile handset (IMEI 866418082465391) into interim custody pending trial of C.R. 995/2025 (animal cruelty charges). The handset must be released on a Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions: the applicant cannot alter, transfer, or damage the device and must produce it whenever directed by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts