State of Maharashtra vs Nitin Bhikaji Divase — 547/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030019132026

e-Filing Number

29-11-2025

Filing Number

1914/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

547/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

6-15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

435

Police Station

Laxmipuri Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Bhikaji Divase

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 547/2026 Summary: Nitin Bhikaji Divse, age 45, was charged with drunk driving under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act after being found driving vehicle MH-09-EL-1050 on November 19, 2025, in Kolhapur. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lokadalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment in default), showing leniency based on his guilty plea, lack of criminal antecedents, and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 547/2026 Summary: Nitin Bhikaji Divse, age 45, was charged with drunk driving under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act after being found driving vehicle MH-09-EL-1050 on November 19, 2025, in Kolhapur. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lokadalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment in default), showing leniency based on his guilty plea, lack of criminal antecedents, and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case