State of Maharashtra vs Sambhaji Akaram Patil — 540/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030013562026

e-Filing Number

29-11-2025

Filing Number

1356/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

540/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

6-15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

149

Police Station

Gaganbawada Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sambhaji Akaram Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: Sambhaji Aakaram Patil was convicted under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 19/11/2025 in Kolhapur. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and, considering his lack of criminal antecedence, poor financial condition, and family dependence, imposed leniency by sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 540/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Sambhaji Aakaram Patil was convicted under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving under the influence of alcohol on 19/11/2025 in Kolhapur. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and, considering his lack of criminal antecedence, poor financial condition, and family dependence, imposed leniency by sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case