State of Maharashtra vs Sahil Kiran Tapachikar — 1071/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 130(1)/177,128(1)/194(c). Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030010942026

Filing Number

1094/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

1071/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

6-15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 130(1)/177,128(1)/194(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sahil Kiran Tapachikar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sahil Kiran Tapachikar (1071/2026) The accused Sahil Kiran Tapachikar was convicted under Motor Vehicle Act Sections 130(1)/177 and 128(1)/194(c) for driving without a valid license and operating a motorcycle with an illegal triple seat on 10/10/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted his plea, showing leniency by imposing only fines: Rs. 200 (with 1 day SI default) and Rs. 1,000 (with 1 day SI default), avoiding substantive imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1071/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sahil Kiran Tapachikar (1071/2026) The accused Sahil Kiran Tapachikar was convicted under Motor Vehicle Act Sections 130(1)/177 and 128(1)/194(c) for driving without a valid license and operating a motorcycle with an illegal triple seat on 10/10/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted his plea, showing leniency by imposing only fines: Rs. 200 (with 1 day SI default) and Rs. 1,000 (with 1 day SI default), avoiding substantive imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case