State of Maharashtra vs Umar Nadaf — 1228/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 128(1)/194(c)/3(1)/181. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO030009562026

Filing Number

956/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

1228/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kolhapur

Judge

6-15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 128(1)/194(c)/3(1)/181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Umar Nadaf

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 1228/2026 Umar Nadaf was convicted under Sections 128(1)/194(c) and 3(1)/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a motorcycle with a triple seat without a valid license on 16/9/2025 in Kolhapur. After voluntarily pleading guilty and requesting minimum punishment, the court accepted his plea and sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,000 for the first offense (one day S.I. in default) and Rs. 2,000 for the second offense (one day S.I. in default), showing leniency by avoiding substantive imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    15th Jt.CJJD and JMFC Kolhapur.

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1228/2026 Umar Nadaf was convicted under Sections 128(1)/194(c) and 3(1)/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a motorcycle with a triple seat without a valid license on 16/9/2025 in Kolhapur. After voluntarily pleading guilty and requesting minimum punishment, the court accepted his plea and sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,000 for the first offense (one day S.I. in default) and Rs. 2,000 for the second offense (one day S.I. in default), showing leniency by avoiding substantive imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case