State of Maharashtra vs Satish @ Sandeep Sakharam Powalkar — 276/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395, 397, 120b, 324, 323, 504. Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO010047492023
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2278/2023
Filing Date
11-12-2023
Registration No
276/2023
Registration Date
12-12-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
FIR Details
FIR Number
406
Police Station
Police Station Karvir
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Satish @ Sandeep Sakharam Powalkar
Vishal Dhanaji Varekar
Ambaji shivaji Sulekar
Bhupendra alis Bhupesh alis Rana Gajrajsinh Yadav alis Pavan Sharma (Abscond )
Ankit alis Chotu Shrinavas Sharma
Harikesh alis Kuddu pudiputra Ranvirsinh Tomar ( Abscond)
Vikas Munnalal Sharma ( Abscond )
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 02-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 27-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 23-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 17-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Accused No.1 in Sessions Case No.276/2023 has been rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found that despite the accused's arguments regarding family hardship (ailing mother, pending divorce proceedings) and alleged lack of direct evidence, the earlier High Court rejection of bail (dated 26/08/2024) remained binding. The court noted material evidence including melted gold worth Rs.22 lakhs recovered from the accused, CDR records showing contact between accused persons, and CCTV footage placing the accused at the crime scene. Given the grave nature of the offense—armed dacoity with firearms causing grievous injury and theft of property worth Rs.2.6 Crores—the court found no change in circumstances to warrant reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Accused No.1 in Sessions Case No.276/2023 has been rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found that despite the accused's arguments regarding family hardship (ailing mother, pending divorce proceedings) and alleged lack of direct evidence, the earlier High Court rejection of bail (dated 26/08/2024) remained binding. The court noted material evidence including melted gold worth Rs.22 lakhs recovered from the accused, CDR records showing contact between accused persons, and CCTV footage placing the accused at the crime scene. Given the grave nature of the offense—armed dacoity with firearms causing grievous injury and theft of property worth Rs.2.6 Crores—the court found no change in circumstances to warrant reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts