Abhijit Maruti Patil vs State of Maharashtra Through Radhanagari Police Station — 1068/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th April 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO010047362025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-12-2025

Filing Number

1977/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

1068/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Decision Date

11th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

Police Station Radhanagri.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1), 238, 311, 61(2), 3(5),

Petitioner(s)

Abhijit Maruti Patil

Adv. vaibhav shekhar halake

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Radhanagari Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

11-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Order

30-03-2026

Order

24-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

11-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected both bail applications of Abhijit Maruti Patil and Kapil Bhagwan Patale, who are charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, and robbery in connection with a woman's death. The court found sufficient evidence against both applicants: gold ornaments recovered at Abhijit's instance matching the victim's ornaments, his extra-judicial confession, witness testimony placing Kapil near the crime scene, and video evidence showing Kapil's absence from a procession during the crime window. Considering the grave nature of the offence, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected both bail applications of Abhijit Maruti Patil and Kapil Bhagwan Patale, who are charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, and robbery in connection with a woman's death. The court found sufficient evidence against both applicants: gold ornaments recovered at Abhijit's instance matching the victim's ornaments, his extra-judicial confession, witness testimony placing Kapil near the crime scene, and video evidence showing Kapil's absence from a procession during the crime window. Considering the grave nature of the offence, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case