Abhijit Maruti Patil vs State of Maharashtra Through Radhanagari Police Station — 1068/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010047362025
e-Filing Number
16-12-2025
Filing Number
1977/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
1068/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
11th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
Police Station Radhanagri.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abhijit Maruti Patil
Adv. vaibhav shekhar halake
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Radhanagari Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order | |
| 30-03-2026 | Order | |
| 24-03-2026 | Order | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected both bail applications of Abhijit Maruti Patil and Kapil Bhagwan Patale, who are charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, and robbery in connection with a woman's death. The court found sufficient evidence against both applicants: gold ornaments recovered at Abhijit's instance matching the victim's ornaments, his extra-judicial confession, witness testimony placing Kapil near the crime scene, and video evidence showing Kapil's absence from a procession during the crime window. Considering the grave nature of the offence, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected both bail applications of Abhijit Maruti Patil and Kapil Bhagwan Patale, who are charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, and robbery in connection with a woman's death. The court found sufficient evidence against both applicants: gold ornaments recovered at Abhijit's instance matching the victim's ornaments, his extra-judicial confession, witness testimony placing Kapil near the crime scene, and video evidence showing Kapil's absence from a procession during the crime window. Considering the grave nature of the offence, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts