State of Maharashtra vs Shubham Ajit Haladkar — 250/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO010045872025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1915/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
250/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur
FIR Details
FIR Number
557
Police Station
Police Station Rajarampuri
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Shubham Ajit Haladkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur
Charge
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Charge |
| 02-06-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 05-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 27-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 250/2025 Summary: Accused Shubham Ajit Haladkar's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita was rejected. The Special (Atrocity) Judge found sufficient material connecting him to the August 27, 2025 knife attack on informant Asu Badshaha Shaikh, supported by injury certificates and weapon recovery. The court noted nine pending criminal cases against Haladkar with non-bailable warrants, demonstrating a pattern of bail violations and non-cooperation with trials, creating risk of witness tampering and trial absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 250/2025 Summary: Accused Shubham Ajit Haladkar's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita was rejected. The Special (Atrocity) Judge found sufficient material connecting him to the August 27, 2025 knife attack on informant Asu Badshaha Shaikh, supported by injury certificates and weapon recovery. The court noted nine pending criminal cases against Haladkar with non-bailable warrants, demonstrating a pattern of bail violations and non-cooperation with trials, creating risk of witness tampering and trial absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts